Open this publication in new window or tab >> Ilia State University, Georgia.
Université de Lille, France.
North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences, United States.
N. Laverov Federal Center for Integrated Arctic Research of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Federation.
N. Laverov Federal Center for Integrated Arctic Research of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Federation.
Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Czech Republic.
Universidade do Porto, Portugal; Biodiversity and Land Planning, CIBIO, Portugal.
University of Porto, Portugal.
Universidade do Porto, Portugal; Biodiversity and Land Planning, CIBIO, Portugal; University of Porto, Portugal.
Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Turkey.
Wetland and Aquatic Research Center, USA.
Institute of Marine Biological Resources and Inland Waters, Greece.
Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Turkey.
N. Laverov Federal Center for Integrated Arctic Research of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Federation.
Technical University of Munich, Germany.
University of Zagreb, Croatia.
Ilia State University, Georgia.
Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt/M., Germany.
Natural History Museum, Switzerland; University of Bern, Switzerland.
Karlstad University, Faculty of Health, Science and Technology (starting 2013), Department of Environmental and Life Sciences (from 2013).
National Museum of Natural History, USA.
Universidade do Porto, Portugal; Biodiversity and Land Planning, CIBIO, Portugal; Université des Antilles, France.
CNR Water Research Institute, Italy.
University of Gdańsk, Poland.
The Rural Economy and Agricultural Society, Sweden.
Agricultural University of Tirana, Albania.
Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Romania.
Vilnius University, Lithuania.
University of Texas, USA.
University of Minho, Portugal.
Bavarian Academy for Nature Conservation and Landscape Management, Germnay.
University of Jyväskylä, FInland.
Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Portugal.
Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Bulgaria.
Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Bulgaria.
Poznań University of Life Sciences, Poland.
University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
Universidade do Porto, Portugal; University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Portugal.
Universidade do Porto, Portugal; Biodiversity and Land Planning, CIBIO, Portugal.
N. Laverov Federal Center for Integrated Arctic Research of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Russian Federation.
Ichthyological Research Initiative, Austria.
Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland.
Central Michigan University, USA.
University of Nottingham, UK.
Institute of Marine Biological Resources and Inland Waters, Greece.
University of Porto, Portugal.
Show others...
2024 (English) In: Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, ISSN 1055-7903, E-ISSN 1095-9513, Vol. 195, article id 108046Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en] The global decline of freshwater mussels and their crucial ecological services highlight the need to understand their phylogeny, phylogeography and patterns of genetic diversity to guide conservation efforts. Such knowledge is urgently needed for Unio crassus, a highly imperilled species originally widespread throughout Europe and southwest Asia. Recent studies have resurrected several species from synonymy based on mitochondrial data, revealing U. crassus to be a complex of cryptic species. To address long-standing taxonomic uncertainties hindering effective conservation, we integrate morphometric, phylogenetic, and phylogeographic analyses to examine species diversity within the U. crassus complex across its entire range. Phylogenetic analyses were performed using cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (815 specimens from 182 populations) and, for selected specimens, whole mitogenome sequences and Anchored Hybrid Enrichment (AHE) data on ∼ 600 nuclear loci. Mito-nuclear discordance was detected, consistent with mitochondrial DNA gene flow between some species during the Pliocene and Pleistocene. Fossil-calibrated phylogenies based on AHE data support a Mediterranean origin for the U. crassus complex in the Early Miocene. The results of our integrative approach support 12 species in the group: the previously recognised Unio bruguierianus, Unio carneus, Unio crassus, Unio damascensis, Unio ionicus, Unio sesirmensis, and Unio tumidiformis, and the reinstatement of five nominal taxa: Unio desectus stat. rev., Unio gontierii stat. rev., Unio mardinensis stat. rev., Unio nanus stat. rev., and Unio vicarius stat. rev. Morphometric analyses of shell contours reveal important morphospace overlaps among these species, highlighting cryptic, but geographically structured, diversity. The distribution, taxonomy, phylogeography, and conservation of each species are succinctly described.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Academic Press Inc., 2024
Keywords Conservation, Freshwater mussels, Phylogeography, Unionida
National Category
Ecology Zoology Biological Systematics
Research subject
Biology
Identifiers urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-99271 (URN) 10.1016/j.ympev.2024.108046 (DOI) 2-s2.0-85189094828 (Scopus ID)
2024-04-092024-04-092024-04-09 Bibliographically approved